Worked Example - Case Input

{
 "documentType": "case_input",
 "schemaVersion": "0.1.0",
 "caseId": "case-example-001",
 "createdAt": "2026-07-15T12:10:00Z",
 "contractRef": {
 "contractId": "example-grounded-analysis",
 "contractVersion": "0.1.0",
 "contentHash": "sha256:c99c25a0a010f6e69774d0d7a187753a0cb328e8673a74b2b051fff44b1bf3a5"
 },
 "task": {
 "taskId": "task-example-001",
 "taskType": "evidence_grounded_analysis",
 "prompt": "Using Evidence E1 and E2, assess whether Initiative X is the primary cause of the observed improvement in Outcome Y. Give a concise conclusion and explain the evidence.",
 "taskInstructions": [],
 "expectedOutputFormat": "One concise analytical paragraph with evidence identifiers.",
 "contentHash": "sha256:deae115ef5c75b4b125e4dbb09937257231c21abcefcfb6b9c024804a1d14ec6",
 "metadata": {
 "requiresCausalAssessment": true
 }
 },
 "evidenceBundle": [
 {
 "evidenceId": "E1",
 "evidenceClassId": "supplied-study",
 "title": "Observational comparison",
 "content": "An observational comparison found Outcome Y was 18% higher in units using Initiative X. The authors state that units self-selected into the initiative and that the study does not identify a causal effect.",
 "contentHash": "sha256:192359f876334c9282c7e79247a6b78b913f63cfb032b68d8c0f7466e6cdce82",
 "authorityRank": 3,
 "permitted": true,
 "capturedAt": "2026-07-15T12:05:00Z",
 "metadata": {
 "studyDesign": "observational"
 }
 },
 {
 "evidenceId": "E2",
 "evidenceClassId": "supplied-study",
 "title": "Randomized pilot",
 "content": "A randomized pilot estimated a 4% improvement in Outcome Y. The confidence interval included zero, so the pilot did not establish a statistically distinguishable effect.",
 "contentHash": "sha256:b3bba4e3b5b48b3ace0ec78b81738a837464d94d945689b57065d2f8f50c4428",
 "authorityRank": 3,
 "permitted": true,
 "capturedAt": "2026-07-15T12:05:00Z",
 "metadata": {
 "studyDesign": "randomized_pilot"
 }
 }
 ],
 "attempt": {
 "attemptId": "attempt-example-001",
 "authorId": "worker-104",
 "content": "Initiative X is associated with higher Outcome Y, but the supplied evidence does not establish that it is the primary cause. E1 reports an 18% observational difference while explicitly noting self-selection and no causal identification. E2 estimates a 4% improvement, but its interval includes zero. The strongest justified conclusion is that X may contribute to the improvement; primacy remains unproven.",
 "contentHash": "sha256:8d0c8290f24f40ae2ca136a7556dbaa2938591a756497506d927d6fc28d43a64",
 "submittedAt": "2026-07-15T12:08:00Z",
 "attachments": [],
 "toolTraces": []
 },
 "humanReview": {
 "annotationId": "review-example-001",
 "reviewerId": "reviewer-207",
 "label": "fail",
 "score": 0,
 "reasonCodes": [
 "not_direct_answer"
 ],
 "rationale": "Fail. The attempter did not choose yes or no and therefore did not answer the question directly.",
 "criterionAnnotations": [
 {
 "criterionId": "C1-direct-response",
 "verdict": "not_met",
 "severity": "major",
 "rationale": "The response did not choose yes or no.",
 "citedSpans": [
 {
 "artifactType": "attempt",
 "artifactId": "attempt-example-001",
 "quotedText": "the supplied evidence does not establish that it is the primary cause",
 "locator": "sentence 1"
 }
 ]
 }
 ],
 "reviewerConfidence": {
 "rawScore": 0.9,
 "band": "uncalibrated"
 },
 "submittedAt": "2026-07-15T12:09:00Z"
 },
 "referenceAnswers": [
 {
 "referenceId": "reference-example-001",
 "role": "illustrative",
 "content": "The evidence suggests a possible contribution from X but does not establish that X is the primary cause.",
 "contentHash": "sha256:83260b932b3b8b56d7785dc4ff7d859c2cc77426b927cba51ae6f2571d9c04d0"
 }
 ],
 "declaredExpectedElements": [],
 "caseTags": [
 "synthetic",
 "positive-attempt",
 "incorrect-human-fail",
 "causal-warrant"
 ],
 "metadata": {
 "example": true
 }
}